Herbs do not cause cancer. In cancers that feed off estrogen (note that they must already exist to do this), there is a good case that herbs keep the cancers from growing, the genestein in Red Clover being one example, the sanguinarine in bloodroot is another.
As I am reading this thread, it occurs to me that "precancerous cells" needs definition. Growingmelons: Simply telling you that you have "precancerous cells" could mean more than one thing. Have you been diagnosed with something like Atypical Hyperplasia? Or possibly Ductal Carcinoma In Situ? What is the exact situation? It could very well be that the fear of a certain future death sentence is unwarranted. What is the exact diagnosis?
As for Protandim, it is good for many things and is shown in research (going by memory here) to reduce some cancers and would certainly be good for precancerous conditions and/or for avoidance, in my opinion. Once on actually gets cancer, it is too late for Protandim even though it would be a help. I think there are doctors who condemn herbs & etc. because of the vast quackery out there rather than turning their attention to the peer reviewed research that does exist or at least evidence of them actually working in the absense of research.
BTW, I am not a doctor, nor does one need to be a doctor to have an opinion.
Basic starting point for avoiding cancer: Alkalize. Detoxify. Eat right and exercise.
Let's not conduct a wholesale condemnation of "herbs" when herbs are not the problem. Which brings me back to square one. What exactly is the problem/diagnosis?
As I am reading this thread, it occurs to me that "precancerous cells" needs definition. Growingmelons: Simply telling you that you have "precancerous cells" could mean more than one thing. Have you been diagnosed with something like Atypical Hyperplasia? Or possibly Ductal Carcinoma In Situ? What is the exact situation? It could very well be that the fear of a certain future death sentence is unwarranted. What is the exact diagnosis?
As for Protandim, it is good for many things and is shown in research (going by memory here) to reduce some cancers and would certainly be good for precancerous conditions and/or for avoidance, in my opinion. Once on actually gets cancer, it is too late for Protandim even though it would be a help. I think there are doctors who condemn herbs & etc. because of the vast quackery out there rather than turning their attention to the peer reviewed research that does exist or at least evidence of them actually working in the absense of research.
BTW, I am not a doctor, nor does one need to be a doctor to have an opinion.
Basic starting point for avoiding cancer: Alkalize. Detoxify. Eat right and exercise.
Let's not conduct a wholesale condemnation of "herbs" when herbs are not the problem. Which brings me back to square one. What exactly is the problem/diagnosis?