12-07-2012, 05:16 PM
Thanks Isabelle, these are some fascinating questions. I have no actual answers, but a few thoughts for what they are worth!
(12-07-2012, 02:48 PM)Isabelle Wrote: I have quite a few questions too:
- Why doesn't anyone seem to grow on SP alone? I have my doubts about SP and what it really does, irrespective of what he literature says
- Soy users generally have excellent skin, but why do many have no breasts? Dont know, but since half the planet seems to exist on Soy as a staple, it can't nearly as effective as we think, for some reason.
- Why is there no literature on women who have no boobs because they have been consuming a dietary or environmental anti-estrogen for too long? Because nobody has put two and two together, asked the question and got the funding?
- Why do some transition regimes insist on adding a progestin? To add the rounding factor to the triangular 'estrogen only' shape?
- Why don't gym rats take anti-estrogens instead of aromatase inhibitors? Could it be because psychologically they dont want to admit to being he-men with an estrogen problem?
- Why do we lose size when we stop phyto-estrogens, if gynecomastia are so hard to get rid of? Now this IS a good question! It has always appeared to me that a lot of natural gynecomastia growth is actually fat rather than real tissue and many sufferers appear to be on the overweight side of things.. If it is naturally depositing on the chest preferentially, then losing weight overall is probably going to actually make the effect worse by emphasising it.