06-04-2010, 01:14
Hi Carla,
Last november you answered a post of mine (here it is cut&paste):
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hey Dory and Carla,
Why would maca and PM cancle each other out?
Thanks
carla
(no login)
Re: PM & MACA November 25 2009, 1:19 PM
This is very simple. They both contain compounds that are estrogenic. They compete for the same receptors.
Maca is considered an adaptogen meaning if you have too much estradiol it competes for the same receptors and moderates some of the effects of estradiol by blocking the actions of some of it. If estradiol is low it still locks into those receptors but has a mild estrogenic effect hence balancing effect.
When you take a strong estrogen like PM you do not want weak estrogens to compete with it because it dimishes efficacy.
PM has a complex dynamic built into it with many types of estrogens compounds.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I just saw your answer, which I fully understand (thanks!), and now wondering if you have an opinion you could share:
According to an online test identifying a list of symptoms, I seem to fit the profile of someone who is "estrogen dominant" - but low in estrogen, just proportionally even lower in progesterone.
In this case, I'm wondering if the addition of maca to pm would actually be helpful for NBE, in that it might make sure that the estrogen and progesterone levels are balanced?
Since, if I understand what I've read in these forums correctly, it is a balanced hormonal state that causes breast enlargement, rather than necessarily having a HIGH level of estrogen - does this jive with what you know about it?
Or, does PM work for most women regardless of whether they are estrogen dominant to begin with?
Or, do we know if, for the 10% of women that don't react to PM, the problem is that they are estrogen dominant to begin with, so pm just causes the body to shut down estrogen production?
Hope you're able to advise, many thanks in advance.
Paloma
Last november you answered a post of mine (here it is cut&paste):
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hey Dory and Carla,
Why would maca and PM cancle each other out?
Thanks
carla
(no login)
Re: PM & MACA November 25 2009, 1:19 PM
This is very simple. They both contain compounds that are estrogenic. They compete for the same receptors.
Maca is considered an adaptogen meaning if you have too much estradiol it competes for the same receptors and moderates some of the effects of estradiol by blocking the actions of some of it. If estradiol is low it still locks into those receptors but has a mild estrogenic effect hence balancing effect.
When you take a strong estrogen like PM you do not want weak estrogens to compete with it because it dimishes efficacy.
PM has a complex dynamic built into it with many types of estrogens compounds.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I just saw your answer, which I fully understand (thanks!), and now wondering if you have an opinion you could share:
According to an online test identifying a list of symptoms, I seem to fit the profile of someone who is "estrogen dominant" - but low in estrogen, just proportionally even lower in progesterone.
In this case, I'm wondering if the addition of maca to pm would actually be helpful for NBE, in that it might make sure that the estrogen and progesterone levels are balanced?
Since, if I understand what I've read in these forums correctly, it is a balanced hormonal state that causes breast enlargement, rather than necessarily having a HIGH level of estrogen - does this jive with what you know about it?
Or, does PM work for most women regardless of whether they are estrogen dominant to begin with?
Or, do we know if, for the 10% of women that don't react to PM, the problem is that they are estrogen dominant to begin with, so pm just causes the body to shut down estrogen production?
Hope you're able to advise, many thanks in advance.
Paloma